The Cause of Zion: What Zion is Not
The Lord has relentlessly commanded us to seek after the “cause
of Zion”: “I say unto you, keep my commandments, and seek to bring forth and
establish the cause of Zion”!!! (D&C 6:6). The two phrases, “seeking the cause of Zion” and
“keeping the commandments”, are uttered synonymously, in one breath, as if to suggest
that if we are not engaged in one, perhaps we are not doing the other. After
all, the cause of Zion is Christ’s cause!!!
Yet as a latter-day society at large,
we do not seem to comprehend the Lord’s vision. Occasionally we talk about
Zion, sing and read about it. We even go to sacred places and make covenants
with God to consecrate everything we have and are for Zion’s establishment. Could it be that those promises are figurative?
Are they outdated and maybe do not apply?
In this essay I want to discuss a few beliefs that could
contribute to what seems like a massive lacuna in our vision, since the concept
of Zion has somehow been extricated out of it. Before
delving extensively in later essays into what Zion is, I wanted to shed some
light on what Zion is NOT. Historically people have attempted to define Zion
within geographic terms, organizational framework, spiritual concepts, or covenant
bound groups.
What is the “place”?
Although the Lord has clearly prepared a place in the
shadow of the Wasatch Mountains for His Saints to settle, establish His church
and grow, this is not “the place” for Zion. The Salt Lake Valley has been our “home”
for over a century after many wanderings and persecutions. Brigham Young was
relieved to say: “We have been kicked out of the frying-pan into the fire, out
of the fire into the middle of the floor, and here we are and here we will
stay.”
Since our arrival into “the promised Land” of the Salt Lake
Valley, the church has become a worldwide organization. We have expanded enough to set roots “in every
nation, kindred, tongue, and people permanently”[1].
Our perception of Zion has shifted to it
being “everywhere—wherever the Church is” (ibid).
Perhaps what escapes our understanding is that both the
intention to “stay permanently” in the Salt Lake Valley and the admonition to build
Zion “wherever we are planted” are time sensitive!!! Both were needed, even
required, but only until they fulfilled their purpose. After all planting ourselves permanently in
any “place” of the telestial world would not, could not bring about a terrestrial
society, which is what Zion is.
The Lord’s intent to build Zion or the New Jerusalem “in the
western boundaries of the State of Missouri” (D&C 84:2) is clear and
unchangeable. There won’t be any other place.
The scriptures sometimes have a dual meaning or application.
This is especially true for Doctrine and Covenants, written during the initial attempt
to build and redeem Zion, but containing a potent message that applies to us EVEN
MORE since ours is the divine task of building the New Jerusalem. The Lord
speaks of a time when His people yet again will be led out to a place of
Zion:
…I will raise up unto my people a man, who
shall lead them like as Moses led the children of Israel. For ye are the
children of Israel, and of the seed of Abraham, and ye
must needs be led out of bondage[2] by power, and
with a stretched-out arm. And
as your fathers were led at the first, even so shall
the redemption of Zion be (D&C 103:15-18).
Here, as in many other scriptures, the Lord reveals the
necessity of an exile. The persistent pattern of an exile that precedes the
arrival of the Lord’s people to the promised land seems to elude our latter-day
attention and paradigm. In more than one
way we feel that “we have arrived”.
Yet from Moses to the brother of Jared, to Lehi and clear to
the early Saints, countless examples establish the Lord’s pattern of taking “His
people” out of their current circumstance and leading them to a choice place,
“not knowing beforehand” where they should go or what they should do (1Nephi4:6). What the Lord needs is not a people capable of putting
down roots in any given place, but a holy nation willing to go wherever
He leads them.
No single organization
Zion is not
limited to any one church or denomination. Anyone who is living a terrestrial law
will abide the day of the Lord’s coming (Mormon Doctrine, p. 498). Nephi shared his insight on the only significant
latter-day division we will witness and experience:
And he said unto
me: Behold there are save two churches only; the one is the church of the Lamb
of God, and the other is the church of the devil; wherefore, whoso belongeth
not to the church of the Lamb of God belongeth to that great church, which is
the mother of abominations; and she is the whore of all the earth” (1Nephi
14:10).
We are either with the Lord or not,
regardless of what religion or organization we belong to (Matthew 12:30) What
determines our allegiance is not a membership record, but the loyalty of our
heart. “Therefore, see to it that ye
trouble not yourselves concerning the affairs of my church in this
place, saith the Lord, but purify your hearts before me...” (D&C 112:27-28,
emphasis added)
Seeking the cause
of Zion then is not limited to building up any one given institution. It becomes more than simply serving in a
calling. What it does mean and look like
is for us to decide.
Christ made it very clear that His
Kingdom “is not of this world” (John 18:36). Humans tend to build up borders. Zion is free of division lines.
Zion vs. Babylon
Scripturally
Babylon and Zion are juxtaposed. But in real life the division lines between
Babylon and Zion are quite blurred, and, really, nonexistent. The adversary
would prefer for us not to know when we have entered one and exited the other. This
eloquent statement by Elder Maxwell masterfully captures the constant “tug and
pull” action between the two: “Let us once and for all establish our residence
in Zion and give up our summer cottage in Babylon.”[3] The task would be easier
to accomplish if we could tell when we are dressed in the gaudy burqa of
Babylon and when all we a have to our name is a rustic tunic of Zion.
Babylon is like all-inclusive
resort, inviting and tantalizing, where all visitors are welcome, especially if
they stay. Like the Enchanted Island it embraces all that set foot anywhere
near it. Zion, on the other hand, is more of an Enchanted castle, overgrown
with briars and thorns, hard to find, nearly impossible to get to and requires your
absolute best to stay at.
While Babylon
offers unconditional acceptance to all, Zion hands out “Admit One Only” tickets
to those that are tenacious enough to face the world’s rejection and opposition.
Babylon is replete
with “philosophies of men” mingled with scripture, while Zion stands resolute
and immovable in “pure religion and undefiled” (Joseph Smith). Babylonian wisdom
is full of counterfeit ideologies and “inadvertent” worship of the various false
gods. Zion intentionally sets “the eye single to the Glory of God” (D&C 4:5)
and remains rivetted to it until the end.
Zion vs. Israel
Gileadi). Thus, the returning remnant will not only be making its way to a holy geographic location, but through repentance traversing the telestial wilderness into the presence of God!!!
Without a proper
vision of Zion, we could never get there. Zion is not staying in place,
it isn’t guaranteed by membership in a church or a group. It takes courage to
find outside the walls of the omnipresent Babylon and an exodus to get to. But
if we choose to repent we too can return as a remnant unto the Lord as we humbly
seek after the cause of Zion!!!!
[1]“Israel,
Israel God is calling” Elder Holland , September 2012.
[2]
Note, that Lord is talking about our redemption from bondage. While we are
currently a free country this reference perhaps suggests that we will not
always remain so.
[3] See “The Tugs and Pulls of the World” by Elder
Neal A. Maxwell, October 2000.
A very good explanation of Zion, Olya! I definitely want to flee Babylon and be a part of establishing Zion!
ReplyDeleteI am a literary snob and extremely critical of most modern day writing. But I can tell you that you have a gift and I am glad to see that you are using it. You are very eloquent and have a way of distilling large, complicated concepts in a very succinct easily understandable way. Keep writing sister V! Cindy
ReplyDeleteCindy, thank you!!! I appreciate the kind words. Thank you for bringing up The Grand Inquisitor to the forefront of my attention and for calling me "sister V". It's very endearing and makes me miss my mission days. Hope to see you soon, Cindy!
DeleteAgain spot on. Made me reflect and Usha and I have felt that the Lord's church is far bigger than we imagine it to be. I think you addressed that.
ReplyDelete